Isolationism vs. Non-interventionism...
It irks me the way the press spins things... A foreign policy of Isolationism is totally different than a foreign policy of Non-interventionism. Look at these "articles" and the negative spin they encourage:
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/poli...y/1364216.html
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1203/p02s16-usfp.html
It's like equating celibacy with casual dating. What's the consensus here??? What say ye???
Heavy man.... we're all all right.. and we will all shine on......
"A foreign policy of Isolationism is totally different than a foreign policy of Non-interventionism".... ? OK, I guess... what?
Last edited by Hal Foster; 12-03-2009 at 08:12 PM.
Ward? Don't you think you were a little bit hard on the Beaver?
I had to search to see which Ron Paul sentiment you were quoting. This one?
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst121806.htm
No Dr. Paul references intended or used, except by you...Originally Posted by Kim
just the facts...
I think I just "ismed" in my pants.
Me tooI think I just "ismed" in my pants.
"MEIYO" Semper Paratus ~~ He who lives by the sword should train with it frequently~~
Arguing on Geekfest is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that while you are getting dirty, the pig is actually enjoying it.
Another good one is when the Media refers to the Audit the Fed movement as a populist movement.
That cracks me up, because this movement is older than the populist movement, It is grounded in the 18th century idea of Freedom and Independence.
The conflict between wether or not to have a national bank began way before Teddy Roosevelt's Time.
We don't need no damn Bull-Moose!
I think it was Madison who championed a federal bank.
As president Madison established the Second National Bank. He opposed the first on grounds it was not constitutional. It appears stepping into the presidency can change one's opinions.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks